Holt adoption baby

sell by 12/19/66

Statement on Haiti

with 3 comments

Yes, there is an unprecedented voice of reason and appeal for care and consideration surrounding the matter of Haiti.  But we’ve seen how, without constant vigilance, reason can be side-stepped and forgotten.

Adoptees of Color are stepping up to make it known that we are watching:  Some history should not be repeated…

From Adoptees of Color Roundtable

This statement reflects the position of an international community of adoptees of color who wish to pose a critical intervention in the discourse and actions affecting the child victims of the recent earthquake in Haiti. We are domestic and international adoptees with many years of research and both personal and professional experience in adoption studies and activism. We are a community of scholars, activists, professors, artists, lawyers, social workers and health care workers who speak with the knowledge that North Americans and Europeans are lining up to adopt the “orphaned children” of the Haitian earthquake, and who feel compelled to voice our opinion about what it means to be “saved” or “rescued” through adoption.

We understand that in a time of crisis there is a tendency to want to act quickly to support those considered the most vulnerable and directly affected, including children. However, we urge caution in determining how best to help. We have arrived at a time when the licenses of adoption agencies in various countries are being reviewed for the widespread practice of misrepresenting the social histories of children. There is evidence of the production of documents stating that a child is “available for adoption” based on a legal “paper” and not literal orphaning as seen in recent cases of intercountry adoption of children from Malawi, Guatemala, South Korea and China. We bear testimony to the ways in which the intercountry adoption industry has profited from and reinforced neo-liberal structural adjustment policies, aid dependency, population control policies, unsustainable development, corruption, and child trafficking.

For more than fifty years “orphaned children” have been shipped from areas of war, natural disasters, and poverty to supposedly better lives in Europe and North America. Our adoptions from Vietnam, South Korea, Guatemala and many other countries are no different from what is happening to the children of Haiti today. Like us, these “disaster orphans” will grow into adulthood and begin to grasp the magnitude of the abuse, fraud, negligence, suffering, and deprivation of human rights involved in their displacements.

We uphold that Haitian children have a right to a family and a history that is their own and that Haitians themselves have a right to determine what happens to their own children. We resist the racist, colonialist mentality that positions the Western nuclear family as superior to other conceptions of family, and we seek to challenge those who abuse the phrase “Every child deserves a family”  to rethink how this phrase is used to justify the removal of children from Haiti for the fulfillment of their own needs and desires. Western and Northern desire for ownership of Haitian children directly contributes to the destruction of existing family and community structures in Haiti. This individualistic desire is supported by the historical and global anti-African sentiment which negates the validity of black mothers and fathers and condones the separation of black children from their families, cultures, and countries of origin.

As adoptees of color many of us have inherited a history of dubious adoptions. We are dismayed to hear that Haitian adoptions may be “fast-tracked” due to the massive destruction of buildings in Haiti that hold important records and documents. We oppose this plan and argue that the loss of records requires slowing down of the processes of adoption while important information is gathered and re-documented for these children. Removing children from Haiti without proper documentation and without proper reunification efforts is a violation of their basic human rights and leaves any family members who may be searching for them with no recourse. We insist on the absolute necessity of taking the time required to conduct a thorough search, and we support an expanded set of methods for creating these records, including recording oral histories.

We urge the international community to remember that the children in question have suffered the overwhelming trauma of the earthquake and separation from their loved ones. We have learned first-hand that adoption (domestic or intercountry) itself as a process forces children to negate their true feelings of grief, anger, pain or loss, and to assimilate to meet the desires and expectations of strangers. Immediate removal of traumatized children for adoption—including children whose adoptions were finalized prior to the quake— compounds their trauma, and denies their right to mourn and heal with the support of their community.

We affirm the spirit of Cultural Sovereignty, Sovereignty and Self-determination embodied as rights for all peoples to determine their own economic, social and cultural development included in the Convention on the Rights of the Child; the Charter of the United Nations; the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples; and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The mobilization of European and North American courts, legislative bodies, and social work practices to implement forced removal through intercountry adoption is a direct challenge to cultural sovereignty. We support the legal and policy application of cultural rights such as rights to language, rights to ways of being/religion, collective existence, and a representation of Haiti’s histories and existence using Haiti’s own terms.

We offer this statement in solidarity with the people of Haiti and with all those who are seeking ways to intentionally support the long-term sustainability and self-determination of the Haitian people. As adoptees of color we bear a unique understanding of the trauma, and the sense of loss and abandonment that are part of the adoptee experience, and we demand that our voices be heard. All adoptions from Haiti must be stopped and all efforts to help children be refocused on giving aid to organizations working toward family reunification and caring for children in their own communities. We urge you to join us in supporting Haitian children’s rights to life, survival, and development within their own families and communities.

Please feel free to add your endorsement in the comments section below this statement at the Adoptees of Color Roundtable Statement on Haiti


Written by girl4708

January 27, 2010 at 8:25 am

Posted in Uncategorized

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Yes. The American Judeo-Christian way of life, law, and liberty is better. America has set more people free than any country in the history of the world.

    The authors motive and political bent seems to be suspect, and filled with very generalized statements. Also, citing corrupt organizations e.g. the UN heavily discredits the argument.

    And, “Adoptees of Color Round-table”? Really? Sounds like some people with an agenda.

    Apparently MLK, Jr’s words still have not been taken to heart.

    >>An American “of color”


    January 28, 2010 at 1:16 pm

  2. Many of (if not most of) the Adoptees of Color are also Americans of Color.

    And of course there is an agenda. That is to ensure that the children’s immediate or extended family is found before adoption is considered, and that Haitian law be followed, which requires that adoptions take place on adoption soil so Haitians can determine the future of their own citizens.

    If you were caught in an earthquake and your sister died and her child was sent to an unattainable address with unnamed people to an unknown country you’ve never been, where you can’t speak the language and can’t afford to travel to retrieve the child, and nobody bothered to contact you to ask if you or anyone else in your family cared to take care of her, what would you do? What about the child’s adjustment to such a situation on top of the loss of the mother and immediate family?

    Asking for safeguards isn’t a motivation to suspect. Those who would disregard safeguards are the ones whose motives need to be questioned.


    January 28, 2010 at 4:47 pm

  3. I am right there with you girl4708. Unfortunately, the nationalism, like the sort I detect in MB’s message is what allows for these hasty adoptions to take place. I grew up in an American Judeo-Christian family, and yes my adoptive sisters grew up with a strong sense of who they were (because they were the biological children of my parents). They got all of their needs taken care of and my parents never needed to discuss their identity with them. But, I was not biologically theirs, and I never felt like I belonged. I had actually felt kidnapped by them (I was almost 5, so I remember being adopted). And my parents never acknowledged the overwhelming feelings that I had so I grew up very troubled, so troubled that there were times when I could not cope.

    Now, any sensible person who can imagine what it’s like to be displaced and not know what is going on can understand what it will be like for these children (and their families) if they are sent abroad. Also, well-intentioned aid agencies wanting to help these children would do well to wait. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child stipulates that international adoption should be the last resort. Family, then community, should always come first.


    February 15, 2010 at 10:09 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: